Author: DA Gadgets

Posted on by

US passes first major national crypto legislation

Natalie Sherman

BBC News

Getty Images US House Speaker Mike Johnson, a Republican from Louisiana, speaks to members of the media while walking to the House Chamber during a vote at the US Capitol in Washington, DC, US, on Thursday, July 17, 2025. Getty Images

Lawmakers in the US have passed the country’s first major national cryptocurrency legislation.

It is a major milestone for the once fringe industry, which has been lobbying Congress over regulation for years and poured millions into last year’s election, backing candidates that included Donald Trump.

The bill sets up a regulatory regime for so-called stablecoins, a kind of cryptocurrency backed by assets seen as reliable, such as the dollar.

Trump is expected to sign the legislation into law on Friday, after the House passed the bill on Thursday, joining the Senate, which had approved the measure last month.

Known as the Genius Act, the bill is one of three pieces of cryptocurrency legislation advancing in Washington that is backed by Trump.

The president once derided crypto as a scam but his opinion shifted as he won backing from the sector and got involved in the industry as a businessman, with ties to firms such as World Liberty Financial.

Supporters of the legislation say it is aimed at providing clear rules for a growing industry, ensuring the US keeps pace with advances in payment systems. The crypto industry had been pushing for such measures in hopes it could spur more people to use digital currency and bring it more into the mainstream.

The provisions include requiring stablecoins, an alternate cryptocurrency to the likes of Bitcoin, to be backed one-for-one with US dollars, or other low-risk assets. Stablecoins are used by traders to move funds between different crypto tokens.

The use of these coins, which are viewed as less volatile, has grown rapidly in recent years.

Critics argue the bill will introduce new risks into the financial system, by legitimising stablecoins without erecting sufficient protections for consumers.

For example, they said it would deepen tech firms’ participation in bank-like activities without subjecting them to similar oversight, and leave customers hanging in a convoluted bankruptcy process in the event that a stablecoin firm should fail.

They had also tried to rally opposition to the bill by arguing that voting in favour was effectively condoning Trump’s business activities – including his family’s promotion of their own crypto coins.

But it nevertheless drew significant support from Democrats, about half of which supported the bill, as well as the majority of Republicans.

“Some members may believe passage of this bill, even with flaws, is better than the status quo. We believe this is a fundamental misunderstanding of the risks involved with these instruments,” a coalition of consumer and advocacy groups wrote in a letter to Congress this spring.

They warned that passage would “allow the proliferation of assets that consumers will wrongly perceive as safe”.

Analysts had expected Congress to pass all three bills earlier this week, but unexpected hiccups led to delays.

The two other bills have passed the House and are headed to the Senate, where Republicans hold a narrow majority. Those bills would prevent the US central bank from establishing a digital currency and set up a regulatory framework for other forms of crypto.

The advance comes as Trump is reportedly working on an presidential order that could allow retirement accounts to be invested in private assets, such as crypto, gold and private equity.

The value of Bitcoin hit a new record this week, passing $120,000 (£89,000).

But Terry Haines of Washington-based analysis firm Pangaea Policy, said he did not expect the other two bills, which are more significant, to go further.

“This is the end of crypto’s wins for quite a while – and the only one,” he wrote. “When the easy part, stablecoin, takes ~4 to 5 years and barely survives industry scandals, it’s not much to crow about.”

Posted on by — Leave a comment

Exploring the Mid-Range and High-Range TV Models of Sony, Samsung, and Panasonic in 2025

Exploring the Mid-Range and High-Range TV Models of Sony, Samsung, and Panasonic in 2025

Introduction to TV Technology in 2025

As technology continues to evolve, the landscape of television is undergoing significant transformations, particularly as we progress through 2025. This era is marked by remarkable innovations that enhance the viewing experience, culminating in superior picture quality, immersive sound, and intelligent features. One of the most notable advancements is the widespread adoption of 8K resolution, which offers over 33 million pixels for stunningly sharp and detailed images. This exceptional clarity ensures that consumers enjoy an unparalleled visual experience, whether watching movies, sports, or documentaries.

Additionally, OLED displays are becoming increasingly prevalent in both mid-range and high-range TV models, thanks to their superior contrast ratios and vibrant color reproduction. Unlike traditional LED screens, OLED technology utilizes organic compounds that emit light individually, allowing for true blacks and an extensive color gamut. This results in a more life-like representation of content, which is particularly appealing for viewers seeking high fidelity.

Moreover, the integration of smart technology in televisions has redefined how we interact with our devices. Smart TVs now come equipped with advanced operating systems that facilitate seamless access to streaming services, social media, and interactive applications. Voice control and AI integration further enhance usability, allowing users to control their viewing experiences simply and intuitively. Connectivity options such as HDMI 2.1 and Wi-Fi 6 are becoming standard, leading to improved streaming performance and reduced latency.

These advances in TV technology not only cater to the demands of tech-savvy consumers but also emphasize the importance of high-quality viewing experiences in modern living rooms. As we explore the mid-range and high-range offerings from leading manufacturers such as Sony, Samsung, and Panasonic, it becomes clear that the innovations of 2025 elevate home entertainment to new heights.

Overview of Mid-Range TVs

In 2025, the mid-range TV market encompasses a diverse selection of television models tailored to meet the needs of a broad audience. Typically, these TVs are priced between $500 and $1,200, accommodating consumers who seek a balance between quality and affordability. As manufacturers like Sony, Samsung, and Panasonic continue to innovate, their mid-range offerings increasingly feature impressive specifications and a range of enhanced functionalities that appeal to discerning viewers.

When evaluating mid-range TVs, consumers can expect to find resolutions of at least 4K Ultra HD, ensuring a clearer and more vibrant picture quality. Additionally, many models now incorporate advanced display technologies, such as OLED and QLED, which significantly enhance contrast ratios and allow for deeper blacks and more vivid colors. Furthermore, the inclusion of HDR (High Dynamic Range) support is becoming more standard, offering viewers enhanced brightness and a wider color spectrum for an immersive viewing experience.

Another notable trend in mid-range TVs is the integration of smart technology features. Most contemporary models include built-in streaming services, voice control capabilities, and compatibility with smart home devices, thus catering to the evolving viewer’s lifestyle and preferences. The usability of these televisions is also improved by user-friendly interfaces, enabling seamless navigation through diverse content offerings.

In terms of value for money, mid-range TVs from prominent brands like Sony, Samsung, and Panasonic provide an impressive balance of performance and affordability. Consumers can conduct a thorough evaluation of different models, weighing specifications, functionalities, and brand reputation to find the perfect fit for their entertainment requirements. Offering both quality and performance, mid-range TVs remain a popular choice among homeowners seeking to elevate their viewing experience without exceeding their budget.

High-Range TV Features

In the rapidly evolving landscape of television technology, high-range TV models from leading brands such as Sony, Samsung, and Panasonic stand out due to their impressive array of features that significantly enhance the viewing experience. One of the most compelling aspects of high-range TVs is their superior picture quality. Many of these models utilize advanced display technologies, such as OLED and QLED, which provide unparalleled contrast, deeper blacks, and vibrant colors. Furthermore, with 8K resolution becoming increasingly accessible, consumers can expect a level of detail that far surpasses that of mid-range alternatives, making them ideal for large screens and dedicated home theater setups.

In addition to exceptional visual performance, sound technology plays a crucial role in distinguishing high-range TVs from their mid-range counterparts. Many high-end models incorporate Dolby Atmos and DTS:X sound systems, which create a dynamic audio experience by simulating a multi-dimensional sound environment. This immersive audio capability complements the stunning visuals and enhances the overall experience for viewers, particularly for those who enjoy cinematic presentations.

Smart capabilities are another hallmark of high-range televisions. These premium models typically feature intuitive user interfaces and seamless integration with popular streaming services. Enhanced connectivity options, such as HDMI 2.1 and Wi-Fi 6, ensure that high-range TVs deliver lightning-fast data transfer speeds and support for advanced gaming consoles, making them a perfect fit for tech-savvy consumers. Voice control features, integration with smart home systems, and personalized content recommendations further elevate the smart capabilities of these devices.

Lastly, the design of high-range televisions often reflects premium craftsmanship. With ultra-slim profiles, minimal bezels, and luxurious materials, these TVs are designed to be striking additions to any modern living space. Collectively, these features reaffirm the value and performance of high-range TVs, making them suitable for discerning users who demand the best in entertainment technology.

Sony’s Mid-Range TV Models in 2025

In 2025, Sony continues to establish a strong presence in the mid-range TV market, offering a diverse lineup designed to cater to varying consumer preferences and budget constraints. Among these models, the Sony X80J series stands out with its exceptional balance of performance and affordability. Equipped with a 4K Ultra HD resolution, the X80J series features Sony’s proprietary TRILUMINOS™ technology, which enhances color accuracy and provides vibrant hues. This makes it a suitable choice for consumers seeking a quality viewing experience without the premium price tag of high-end models.

Another noteworthy model in Sony’s mid-range lineup is the X85K series, which builds upon the strengths of the X80J by incorporating enhanced processing capabilities through the Cognitive Processor XR. This technology intelligently analyzes content for improved contrast and detail, allowing users to enjoy realistic imagery across various types of content. The X85K series also supports advanced HDR formats, including HDR10 and Dolby Vision, ensuring a more dynamic range of colors and brightness levels, which is especially beneficial for movie enthusiasts.

From a pricing perspective, these mid-range models are positioned competitively in the market, generally ranging from $900 to $1,500 depending on screen size and features. Consumer reviews highlight the superior build quality and user-friendly interface found in these models. Additionally, many users appreciate the integration of Google TV as their smart platform, offering access to a wide range of streaming services and applications. Overall, Sony’s mid-range TVs in 2025 provide reliable performance, stylish aesthetics, and smart functionalities, making them a solid choice for consumers aiming to strike a balance between quality and cost-effectiveness.

Sony’s High-Range TV Models in 2025

As of 2025, Sony continues to establish itself as a leader in the high-range television segment, showcasing innovative technologies that enhance the viewing experience. Two flagship models that stand out in this lineup are the A95L OLED and the X95K Mini-LED. These models encapsulate Sony’s commitment to quality and cutting-edge technology, attracting enthusiasts and casual viewers alike.

The A95L OLED model represents a pinnacle of picture quality, leveraging Sony’s advanced OLED technology to deliver unmatched contrast and vivid colors. With its self-illuminating pixels, it offers deep blacks while maintaining exceptional brightness levels, making it ideal for varied viewing environments. Additionally, the model incorporates Sony’s Cognitive Processor XR, which intelligently analyzes content for enhanced detail and realism, elevating the viewer’s experience significantly.

On the other hand, the X95K Mini-LED television employs a host of innovative advancements, such as local dimming zones and precise LED control, to provide an immersive visual experience. Its Mini-LED backlighting allows for finer control over brightness levels, minimizing halo effects and enhancing overall picture quality. This model is particularly notable for its ability to render HDR content with improved brightness and clarity, appealing to gamers and cinephiles who demand a top-tier viewing experience.

Beyond these specifications, both models benefit from a sleek design that seamlessly integrates into modern living spaces, coupled with smart features powered by the Google TV platform. This integration allows for easy access to streaming services and a user-friendly interface, further solidifying Sony’s edge in the high-end market. By continuously innovating and prioritizing consumer needs, Sony remains a dominant force in the high-range television arena as we move through 2025.

Samsung’s Mid-Range TV Models in 2025

In 2025, Samsung continues to establish its presence in the mid-range television market with several competitive models that combine advanced technology and affordability. One of the standout offerings is the Samsung Q60B QLED series, which provides vibrant colors and impressive contrast thanks to its Quantum Dot technology. This model showcases a resolution of 4K and supports essential HDR formats, making it well-suited for a wide range of viewing experiences, from movies to sports.

Another notable entry is the Samsung AU8000, which offers a sleek design complemented by its Crystal UHD display. This specific model targets consumers seeking excellent value without compromising on visual performance. The AU8000 features Adaptive Sound technology, allowing users to fully immerse themselves in their favorite content by automatically adjusting audio settings based on the scene or environment.

Price points for these mid-range options range from approximately $500 to $1,000, depending on the size and specifications chosen. This pricing strategy allows Samsung to appeal to a broad customer base, as it provides solid performance within an accessible budget. In comparison to other brands in the same market segment, Samsung’s use of QLED technology distinguishes it from typical LED models, generating higher brightness levels and improved energy efficiency.

Samsung’s integration of smart features enriches the user experience in their mid-range TV models. With the latest Tizen operating system, consumers can enjoy seamless access to various streaming platforms and smart home integration, ultimately enhancing the overall viewing experience. The combination of leading technology and user-friendly features makes Samsung’s mid-range TVs a compelling choice in 2025, positioning them favorably against competitors like Sony and Panasonic.

Samsung’s High-Range TV Models in 2025

In 2025, Samsung continues to assert its dominance in the high-range TV market with a robust lineup that integrates cutting-edge technologies to enhance the viewing experience. Central to these offerings is Samsung’s signature Quantum Dot technology, which allows for a vibrant color palette that significantly surpasses that of traditional LED TVs. This technology utilizes microscopic particles, which emit light in a range of colors, producing richer and more accurate images across various content types.

Additionally, Samsung’s Neo QLED series has redefined home entertainment through its exceptional contrast and brightness levels. By employing mini-LED backlighting, the Neo QLED models provide more precise control over dimming zones, resulting in deeper blacks and brighter highlights. This is particularly beneficial when watching content in various lighting environments, as users can expect consistent picture quality whether in a bright room or a darker setting. Reviews from both experts and consumers highlight how these innovations contribute to a more immersive viewing experience, highlighting the capability of Neo QLED TVs to reproduce fine details that enhance the overall narrative of films and shows.

Moreover, the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Samsung’s high-range models ensures optimized picture and sound quality. The AI Smart Feature analyses content in real-time, intelligently adjusting settings to deliver the best possible experience tailored to the viewer’s preferences. This is a significant step forward in making high-range television not just a viewing device, but an interactive home entertainment system that adapts to the user’s demands.

As a result, Samsung’s high-range offerings in 2025 not only emphasize superior technology, such as Quantum Dot and Neo QLED but also deliver an engaging experience that is supported by positive feedback from expert reviews and users alike. These advancements solidify Samsung’s position as a leader in delivering compelling home entertainment experiences.

Panasonic’s Mid-Range TV Models in 2025

In 2025, Panasonic continues to assert its presence in the mid-range television market by introducing models that incorporate advanced display technologies and innovative features. The company’s commitment to delivering high-quality visual experiences is evident, as its mid-range offerings include OLED and LED displays, providing users with vibrant colors and deep contrasts. Panasonic’s emphasis on picture quality through its proprietary technologies, like HCX Processor, allows for enhanced image processing and accurate color reproduction, making their models a strong contender in this competitive segment.

One significant highlight of Panasonic’s mid-range TVs is their support for various HDR formats, ensuring broad compatibility with content from multiple sources. This adaptability is crucial for consumers who seek to enjoy high-definition content, ranging from streaming platforms to Blu-ray discs. Moreover, Panasonic has implemented features such as Dolby Vision and HDR10+, which elevate the viewing experience by optimizing brightness and contrast levels based on the specific capabilities of the display and the content being viewed. As a result, users can enjoy a more immersive experience that truly reflects the creator’s intentions.

Consumer feedback regarding Panasonic’s mid-range models has been overwhelmingly positive, particularly regarding build quality and user-friendly interfaces. Many users appreciate the ease of navigation provided by the My Home Screen platform, which allows for seamless access to apps and content. Additionally, the incorporation of voice assistant compatibility has been well-received, making it easier for users to control their TVs with simple voice commands.

When placed side by side with competitors such as Sony and Samsung, Panasonic’s mid-range models not only hold their ground but also offer distinctive features that cater to a specific audience. In this regard, they succeed in providing a balanced combination of performance and pricing, appealing to consumers looking for quality without stretching their budgets excessively. Overall, Panasonic’s mid-range TVs in 2025 represent a thoughtful approach to design and technology, reinforcing the manufacturer’s reputation for excellence in the consumer electronics space.

Panasonic’s High-Range TV Models in 2025

In 2025, Panasonic continues to establish itself as a formidable competitor in the high-end television market, offering a diverse range of models that emphasize innovation in display technology and user experience. Panasonic’s high-range TVs prominently feature advanced OLED technology, delivering exceptional picture quality characterized by deep blacks and vibrant colors. This commitment to superior display technology allows users to enjoy an immersive viewing experience, making Panasonic’s offerings highly sought after by audiophiles and cinephiles alike.

One of the flagship models for 2025 is the Panasonic JZ2000, which incorporates a neural processing engine that enhances picture clarity through real-time optimization of brightness and color accuracy. This cutting-edge processor distinguishes Panasonic from competitors like Sony and Samsung, as it ensures that viewers benefit from a personalized viewing experience that adapts to their unique preferences. Additionally, the incorporation of HDR10+ and Dolby Vision technologies in the JZ2000 model elevates the overall visual experience, offering an impressive range of colors and contrast ratios that are remarkable in the realm of home entertainment.

Furthermore, Panasonic has made significant strides in integrating smart features into its high-end televisions. The latest model includes a user-friendly interface supported by an array of streaming applications that cater to diverse entertainment needs. Voice recognition technology is also a key feature, allowing users to control their TV seamlessly through voice commands. Notably, this level of integration and convenience competes directly with similar high-range models from Sony and Samsung, heightening consumer choice in the premium TV market.

Sound quality also plays a crucial role in Panasonic’s premium offerings. With a focus on audio performance, Panasonic employs immersive sound technology, providing a comprehensive surround sound experience that complements its outstanding visual capabilities. This holistic approach to audio-visual excellence sets Panasonic apart, ensuring that their high-range TVs remain a preferred choice for consumers seeking top-notch entertainment solutions.

Posted on by

Does the UK video games industry have a class problem?

Laura Cress

BBC News

BBC A man smiling and wearing glasses standing next to a banner which reads "Into Games. Unlock Talent, Levelling Up Lives." The woman on the banner is laughing with her mouth open and headphones on, and holding up a controller.BBC

“I’m scared for the future of games,” says Chris Goodyear. “It could end up going the way that theatre has, and become a very privileged thing.”

At one of the UK’s largest conferences for video game developers, social class was on the agenda.

The concern raised by Chris, a producer working to highlight accessibility barriers in the industry, is one that some in the sector feel has gone unappreciated for too long.

This year, Develop:Brighton featured its first meet-up dedicated to working-class and low-income people in the UK games industry.

The event was put on by the non-profit organisation Into Games.

Its boss Declan Cassidy set the body up six years ago to try to help “underrepresented people more broadly” in the industry.

This narrowed to focus solely on social mobility, as he said they realised “there weren’t really any other champions” in that area.

In 2024 Into Games released a report which found there was a “really high number of people in working-class and low-income backgrounds coming through existing game educational pathways,” Declan said.

But not many of them actually completed that journey and got jobs.

“They’re being failed at the last hurdle,” he added.

Other A crowd of people wearing lanyards in a big room attending the Develop:Brighton expo. A banner at the back says Indie Showcase, Vote Now.Other

The Into Games report highlighted barriers such as location, access to finance, reduced cultural capital and lack of networks which prevented people from lower socio-economic backgrounds from breaking into the industry.

It found that 59% of participants said they had been made to feel “othered” at some point in their career.

Will Luton, the founder of Village Studio Games, attended the event in Brighton and said he had “felt overt discrimination” due to his class.

He added he often found himself having to “mask” or “rework” the way he talked so he didn’t “give away” where he was from.

Will argued that those like himself who had made it into the industry had a part to play in highlighting the problem, rather than suggesting that just because “they were in” the industry, it suddenly “wasn’t an issue”.

The report also suggested the gaming sector had a smaller proportion of people coming from lower socio-economic backgrounds (13%) compared to film and TV (29%) or music and visual arts (22%).

Nick Poole, head of games industry body Ukie, believed that while the talent was available, the “opportunity wasn’t”.

“If you’re going to tell real stories, people who are young, gifted and broke need to be able to find their way into the industry,” Nick said.

‘Huge’ benefits for studios

Declan Cassidy hopes Into Games’ approach can help those from working class backgrounds across the UK find their place within a precarious sector, which in recent years has seen thousands of jobs lost across the globe.

The organisation plans to focus support on six areas – Birmingham, Brighton, Dundee, London, Manchester and Tees Valley – in the next five years.

The support will include targeting outreach in schools, paid internships and government-funded training, with the group stating that over 100 game studios have confirmed they will take on working-class talent through their programmes in 2025 and 2026.

“By 2030, our aim is to be increasing the number of people from working-class backgrounds in the UK games industry by a factor of 50%,” Declan said.

The benefit could be “huge for studios,” he added.

A green promotional banner with black squares and rectangles forming pixels, moving in from the right. The text says: “Tech Decoded: The world’s biggest tech news in your inbox every Monday.”
Posted on by

WeTransfer says files not used to train AI after backlash

WeTransfer has confirmed it does not use files uploaded to their service to train artificial intelligence (AI) models.

The file sharing company had received lots of criticism from customers on social media after changing its terms of service, which some interpreted as allowing it the right to use files for AI training.

A WeTransfer spokeswoman told BBC News: “We don’t use machine learning or any form of AI to process content shared via WeTransfer, nor do we sell content or data to any third parties.”

The firm has now updated its terms, saying it has “made the language easier to understand” to avoid confusion.

WeTransfer said the clause was initially added to “include the possibility of using AI to improve content moderation” and to identify harmful content.

The terms had said WeTransfer could use content for purposes “including to improve performance of machine learning models that enhance our content moderation process”.

It also included the right for WeTransfer to “reproduce, distribute, modify,” or “publicly display” files uploaded to the service.

Some users on social media interpreted this as WeTransfer giving itself the right to share or sell the files uploaded by users to AI companies.

People working in the creative industries, including an illustrator and an actor, posted on X to say they used the service to send work and were considering changing to alternative providers.

WeTransfer said it updated the clause on Tuesday, “as we’ve seen this passage may have caused confusion for our customers.”

Clause 6.3 in the terms of service now says: “You hereby grant us a royalty-free license to use your Content for the purposes of operating, developing, and improving the Service, all in accordance with our Privacy & Cookie Policy.”

The changes come into effect on 8 August for existing users.

The rival file-sharing platform Dropbox also had to clarify it was not using files uploaded to its service to train AI models, after social media outcry in December 2023.

Tech outlet The Register commented at the time that even though the claim turned out not to be true, the fact that there was such a strong reaction against it showed a lack of trust in tech companies by their users.

Mona Schroedel, a data protection specialist lawyer at Freeths, told BBC News terms of service and privacy policy changes “can come with hidden risks”.

“All companies are keen to cash in on the AI craze and what AI needs more than anything is data,” she said.

“So it is a skip and a hop to trying to use existing data for machine learning exercises under the guise of legitimate interest to improve service provision.”

Users can also be placed in a “difficult position” if terms of a service they are embedded in or rely on suddenly change, she added, saying they may be left with little choice but to continue using it.

Additional reporting by Liv McMahon

Posted on by

New AI voice tool trained to copy British regional accents

A new AI voice-cloning tool from a British firm claims to be able to reproduce a range of UK accents more accurately than some of its US and Chinese rivals.

Because much of the data traditionally used to train AI products with voices comes from North American or southern English speaking sources, many artificial voices tend to sound similar.

To combat this, the company Synthesia spent a year compiling its own database of UK voices with regional accents, through recording people in studios and gathering online material.

It used those to train a product called Express-Voice, which can clone a real person’s voice or generate a synthetic voice.

These can be used in content such as training videos, sales support and presentations.

The company said its customers wanted more accurate regional representations.

“If you’re the CEO of a company, or if you’re just a regular person, when you have your likeness, you want your accent to be preserved,” said Synthesia Head of Research Youssef Alami Mejjati.

He added French-speaking customers had also commented that synthetic French voices tended to sound French-Canadian rather than originating from France.

“This is just because the companies building these models tend to be North American companies, and they tend to have datasets that are biased towards the demographics that they’re in,” he said.

The hardest accents to mimic are the least common, Mr Mejjati said, because there is less recorded material available to train an AI model.

There are also reports that voice-prompted AI products, such as smart speakers, are more likely to struggle to understand a range of accents.

Last year, internal documents from West Midlands Police revealed worries about whether voice recognition systems would understand Brummie accents.

Meanwhile the US-based start-up Sanas is taking the opposite approach, developing tools for deployment in call centres which “neutralise” the accents of Indian and Filipino staff, as reported by Bloomberg in March.

The firm says it aims to reduce “accent discrimination” experienced by workers when callers fail to understand them.

There is concern that languages and dialects are being lost in the digital era.

“Among the over seven thousand languages that still exist today, almost half are endangered according to UNESCO; about a third have some online presence; less than 2 percent are supported by Google Translate; and according to OpenAI’s own testing, only fifteen, or 0.2 percent are supported by GPT-4 [an OpenAI model] above an 80 percent accuracy,” writes Karen Hao in the book Empire of AI.

“Language models are homogenising speech,” agrees AI expert Henry Ajder, who advises governments and tech firms, including Synthesia.

However, the better these products become, the more effective they will also be in the hands of scammers.

Synthesia’s product will not be free when it is released in the coming weeks, and will have guardrails around hate speech and explicit material.

But there are already many free, open-source voice-cloning tools which are easily accessible and less protected.

At the beginning of July, messages generated by an AI-cloned voice impersonating US Secretary of State Marco Rubio were reported to have been sent to ministers.

“The open source landscape for voice has evolved so rapidly over the last nine to 12 months,” Mr Ajder adds.

“And that, from a safety perspective, is a real concern.”

Posted on by

More rules being considered to keep children safe online

Paul Seddon

Political reporter

The government is considering further action to keep children safe online and will not “sit back and wait” on the issue, a cabinet minister has said.

Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander told the BBC new age-verification rules beginning later this month would have a “really important” impact.

She said the regulations, to be overseen by media regulator Ofcom, would not be the “end of the conversation” on online safety.

Ofcom boss Melanie Dawes vowed to rigorously enforce the new requirements, adding the regulator “means business”. But she acknowledged Ofcom may require further legal powers in order to keep pace with the rapidly developing impact of artificial intelligence (AI).

Under new powers introduced by the Online Safety Act and passed under the previous Tory government, Ofcom will require internet companies to conduct stricter age verification methods to check whether a user is under 18.

A new code of practice, to apply from 25 July, will also require platforms to change algorithms affecting what is shown in children’s feeds to filter out harmful content.

At the last election, Labour committed to “build on” the previous government’s law and consider further measures to keep children safe.

But it is yet to publish fresh legislation of its own, with ministers arguing the existing set of new regulations need to be rolled out first.

Speaking to Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg, Ian Russell, whose daughter Molly took her own life at 14 after seeing harmful content online, said the new rules should mark the “biggest moment in online safety” since the arrival of social media.

But he added the “proof of the pudding is in what happens,” adding he thought Ofcom could go further than it has done within the legal powers it has acquired.

He also argued that the regulator should be prepared to “push back” against ministers over “weaknesses” in the legislation.

‘Addictive habits’

Alexander said the new rules would bring in “really robust safeguards” to ensure proper age verification.

But she added: “We are very clear as a government that this is the foundation for a safer online experience for children, but it is not the end of the conversation”.

She said Technology Secretary Peter Kyle was looking at further action in a number of areas, including how to address “addictive habits” among children.

“We’re not going to be a government that sits back and waits on this, we want to address it,” she added.

She did not provide further details, but Kyle has previously indicated he wants to curb the “addictive nature” of apps and smartphones for children.

Proposals under consideration include a two-hour cap on the use of individual social media apps, and a 22:00 curfew.

Phone ban calls

Alexander added that the education secretary was reviewing guidance in England that allows individual headteachers to ban smartphones in schools.

The government has so far stopped short of legislating for a nationwide ban, voting down a Tory attempt to do so in March.

The transport secretary added that it was important to “get the balance right” on the issue, noting that some parents “want their kids to have a phone on their way to school”.

Shadow minister Chris Philp said he wished the previous Tory government had legislated to ban smartphones in schools during its 14 years in power.

He told Kuenssberg it was a “great shame” Labour had not backed a ban, adding: “As a dad myself, I am really concerned about this”.

Ofcom’s chief executive told the programme the new rules would mean tech platforms would have to change their content algorithms “very significantly”.

Ms Dawes said the regulator would give websites some flexibility when deciding which age-verification tools to use, but pledged that those failing to put adequate checks in place “will hear from us with enforcement action”.

However, she acknowledged some newer forms of AI “may not” be covered be powers contained in the existing legislation.

“There may need to be some changes to the legislation to cover that,” she added.

Posted on by — Leave a comment

Understanding Picture Quality: Full Array LED, QLED, OLED, and Mini LED Explained

Understanding Picture Quality: Full Array LED, QLED, OLED, and Mini LED Explained

Introduction to Display Technologies

The realm of display technologies has witnessed significant advancements over the years, evolving to meet the ever-increasing demand for improved picture quality. Among the most prominent technologies available today are Full Array LED, QLED, OLED, and Mini LED. Each of these display types has unique characteristics that can greatly influence the viewing experience.

Full Array LED technology leverages an arrangement of LEDs behind the screen, which enables local dimming. This means that certain areas of the screen can be illuminated or darkened independently to enhance contrast and deliver deeper blacks. This approach improves picture quality by allowing for better control over brightness levels across the display, resulting in a more dynamic range of colors.

In contrast, QLED, or Quantum Dot LED, utilizes quantum dots to improve color accuracy and brightness. QLED displays are characterized by their ability to produce vivid and saturated colors, while also maintaining significant brightness levels, making them ideal for well-lit environments. The application of quantum dots in this technology marks a considerable enhancement in color representation compared to traditional LED displays.

Moving forward, OLED, or Organic Light Emitting Diode technology, represents a shift from backlighting to self-emissive pixels. Each pixel in an OLED display generates its own light, allowing for exceptional contrast ratios and almost perfect blacks. This capability leads to a more immersive viewing experience with broader viewing angles and reduced motion blur.

Lastly, Mini LED technology builds on the foundation of Full Array LED by utilizing smaller LEDs, which allow for a greater number of dimming zones. This results in improved contrast and brightness control while maintaining the benefits of local dimming. The emergence of Mini LED has further blurred the lines between LED and OLED technologies by capitalizing on the strengths of both.

Understanding these advanced display technologies is vital for consumers as they navigate the market in search of superior picture quality. As viewers increasingly prioritize clarity, color accuracy, and overall immersion, a grasp on the fundamental principles behind Full Array LED, QLED, OLED, and Mini LED will guide informed purchasing decisions in the ever-evolving landscape of displays.

What is Full Array LED?

Full Array LED technology represents a significant advancement in LCD TV panel construction. Unlike traditional edge-lit LED displays, Full Array LED panels feature numerous LEDs placed directly behind the screen, evenly distributing lighting across its entire surface. This configuration allows for crucial advancements in brightness and contrast, as local dimming zones can be employed. Each zone can individually adjust light output, making it possible to enhance the dark areas of an image while maintaining brightness in lighter sections, resulting in superior overall picture quality.

The operational mechanism of Full Array LED displays is what sets them apart from other variants of LED technology. While edge-lit panels use LEDs positioned only along the edges, Full Array LED utilizes a grid system of backlighting. This means that when the picture on the screen requires deep blacks, LEDs in that area can dim or even turn off completely, thereby creating a more striking contrast. The capability of local dimming leads to improved performance in scenes where both bright and dark elements coexist, thereby significantly increasing the viewing experience.

However, as impressive as Full Array LED technology is, it is not without its limitations. This technology can sometimes struggle with color accuracy, especially in settings where ambient light is present. Though generally brighter than OLED technology, Full Array LED displays may not achieve the same deep color reproduction and rich blacks. Additionally, the level of local dimming can vary across devices, resulting in inconsistent performance between manufacturers. Despite these drawbacks, Full Array LED remains a popular choice for viewers who prioritize brightness and enhanced contrast in their viewing experience, making it a compelling option for a range of viewing environments.

Exploring QLED Technology

Quantum Dot Light Emitting Diodes, commonly known as QLED, represent a significant advancement in television technology. Utilizing quantum dot technology, QLED displays generate enhanced color and brightness by incorporating a layer of semiconductor nanocrystals. These tiny particles emit light when illuminated, effectively expanding the color volume that can be produced. Consequently, QLED TVs are known for their vibrant colors and impressive brightness, making them particularly well-suited for well-lit environments.

One of the notable strengths of QLED technology lies in its ability to produce a wider range of colors, predominantly at high brightness levels. The quantum dots enable QLED screens to exhibit exceptional color accuracy and consistency for HDR (High Dynamic Range) content. This feature is especially beneficial for viewing experiences that necessitate vivid visuals and lifelike landscapes. Furthermore, QLED televisions can reach extraordinary brightness, which is advantageous when viewing content in brightly lit conditions. This capability ensures that the picture remains clear and colorful, thereby enhancing the overall visual experience.

However, QLED technology does face challenges concerning black levels and contrast. Unlike OLED (Organic Light Emitting Diode) panels, which can achieve true blacks by turning off individual pixels, QLED screens rely on a backlight system. This limitation can sometimes lead to blooming effects, where light spills into dark areas of the image, detracting from the overall contrast ratio. Although advancements are being made in local dimming techniques to improve this aspect, the performance in dark scenes may not fully match that of OLED displays.

Calibration and viewing conditions also play a critical role in optimizing QLED performance. While QLED televisions come preset from the factory, to achieve the best image quality, users should consider performing proper calibration based on their specific viewing environment. Factors such as ambient light levels and screen reflective materials can influence the viewing experience, thus warranting attention during setup.

The OLED Experience

Organic Light Emitting Diode (OLED) technology has revolutionized the television viewing experience, primarily due to its self-emissive characteristics. Unlike traditional LED displays that rely on backlighting, OLED panels illuminate each pixel individually. This unique trait allows OLED screens to achieve true blacks, as pixels can be turned off completely, resulting in an unparalleled contrast ratio. The absence of light bleed ensures that dark scenes possess a depth that is often unattainable in other display types.

The superior picture quality delivered by OLED is further enhanced by its wide color gamut and rapid response time. As a result, viewers can enjoy vibrant colors and smooth motion, making OLED ideal for watching fast-paced sports or action films. In real-world applications, many users report a significant improvement in visual depth and detail, transforming their overall viewing experience into something truly immersive.

Despite its many advantages, OLED technology does come with certain drawbacks. One notable concern is the possibility of burn-in, which occurs when static images are displayed for extended periods, causing a permanent ghost image on the screen. Manufacturers have introduced various techniques to mitigate this issue, such as screen savers and pixel shifting, but users should remain aware of this risk. Additionally, OLED panels typically offer less overall brightness compared to other technologies like QLED or Mini LED. While this may affect brightness in well-lit rooms, many users find that the enhanced contrast compensates effectively, providing a remarkable viewing experience even in moderately illuminated environments.

In conclusion, OLED technology stands out as a pinnacle of modern display innovation, offering impressive picture quality characterized by perfect blacks and stunning color accuracy. Although there are considerations regarding burn-in and brightness, the benefits it brings to both casual viewers and home theater enthusiasts are significant, making OLED a worthy investment for anyone serious about image quality.

Mini LED Technology Explained

Mini LED technology is an innovative advancement in the realm of LED backlighting, providing significant improvements in display performance compared to traditional Full Array LED systems. This technology uses a dense array of miniature LEDs, allowing for more localized control of dimming and brightness levels across the screen. As a result, Mini LED displays can deliver enhanced contrast ratios, making dark scenes appear deeper and more detailed while ensuring bright areas maintain their vibrancy without halo effects.

One of the key benefits of Mini LED technology lies in its ability to achieve precise local dimming. With thousands of tiny LEDs packed behind the screen, the technology can turn off individual zones more effectively than its predecessor, Full Array LED. This zoning capability allows for sharper distinctions between light and dark areas on the screen, effectively reducing light bleed and enhancing overall picture quality. The increased control over contrast provided by Mini LED technology elevates the viewing experience, especially in high dynamic range (HDR) content.

When compared to OLED displays, Mini LED still holds its ground, particularly in terms of brightness. OLEDs provide exceptional color accuracy and true blacks due to their self-emissive nature, where each pixel can turn on or off independently. However, Mini LED can outperform OLED when it comes to high brightness levels, which can sometimes enhance HDR visuals and create an overall more dynamic viewing experience in well-lit environments.

In practical scenarios, Mini LED technology is particularly advantageous for users who enjoy a variety of content, including gaming and movies, as it combines the best characteristics of both LED and OLED without the drawbacks of either. Therefore, as consumers assess their options for displays, Mini LED technology stands out as a versatile and high-performing choice for those seeking an immersive picture quality experience.

Comparative Analysis of Picture Quality

When evaluating picture quality across different display technologies—namely Full Array LED, QLED, OLED, and Mini LED—it is essential to consider key performance factors such as brightness, contrast, color accuracy, viewing angles, motion handling, and responsiveness across diverse content types.

Starting with brightness, Full Array LED and QLED displays are typically renowned for their higher peak brightness levels, which makes them particularly effective in well-lit environments. They can produce vibrant, eye-catching images, especially during the day. In contrast, OLED displays, while capable of achieving excellent performance in darker settings, may struggle to match the brightness levels of their LED counterparts, although they excel in rendering deep blacks due to their self-emissive nature.

Contrast is another critical aspect; OLED technology provides superior contrast compared to Full Array LED and QLED, primarily because of its ability to turn off individual pixels completely, resulting in true blacks. Full Array LED technology mitigates this limitation through local dimming, but the effectiveness varies based on the quality and implementation of the local dimming feature. QLED uses quantum dots to improve brightness and color range, yet its reliance on a backlight means it cannot achieve the same levels of contrast as OLED.

Color accuracy is crucial for picture quality, with OLED generally leading in this regard. However, advancements in QLED technology—particularly with quantum dots—have significantly improved its color reproduction, making it competitive. Full Array LED displays can also deliver decent color accuracy but usually require calibration for optimal results.

Viewing angles pose another challenge, particularly for LCD-based technologies like Full Array LED and QLED, which tend to suffer from color and contrast degradation when viewed from extreme angles. Conversely, OLED displays maintain consistent quality at wider viewing angles, offering a more immersive experience. Lastly, motion handling is imperative, especially for fast-paced content. OLEDs excel at this due to their rapid pixel response times, while QLED and Full Array LED might introduce motion blur without effective motion smoothing technology.

In various content scenarios, each technology has strengths and weaknesses. OLED shines in cinematic experiences, providing exceptional contrast and color depth, while QLED and Full Array LED might be more suitable for bright ambient environments due to their higher brightness levels. Mini LED technology aims to combine the best elements of both LED and OLED, offering improved local dimming and potentially better contrast ratios. By understanding these distinctions, consumers can make more informed decisions when selecting the ideal display technology tailored to their viewing preferences and environments.

User Experience and Considerations

The user experience significantly varies across different display technologies, including Full Array LED, QLED, OLED, and Mini LED, influenced by factors such as room lighting, content type, and individual preferences. Users report distinct observations that impact their viewing satisfaction. For instance, individuals using OLED screens often appreciate the deep blacks and vibrant colors, which enhance movie-watching experiences in dimly lit rooms. A user reflects, “Watching films in the evening with my OLED TV feels cinematic, almost as if I’m in a theater.” This perception sharpens the overall quality, creating an immersive viewing experience.

Conversely, QLED technology tends to excel in bright environments. Users noted that even in well-lit rooms, QLED displays maintain excellent color fidelity and brightness levels. A satisfied QLED user states, “My living room gets a lot of sunlight, but the colors pop on my QLED TV, whether I’m watching sports or Netflix.” This makes QLED particularly suitable for users who find themselves in such lighting conditions.

Different viewing scenarios also play a crucial role in the perceived quality. Gamers, for example, often prioritize refresh rates and response times. Mini LED technology gains favor among gamers due to its superior backlighting and improved contrast ratios, facilitating an impressive gaming experience. A gamer notes, “The detail in shadows and highlights on my Mini LED screen is a game changer, especially in high-action sequences.” In contrast, movie enthusiasts may choose OLED for its exceptional color accuracy and black levels, creating stunning visuals during cinematic experiences.

Ultimately, user experiences with these technologies highlight the importance of aligning one’s viewing preferences and environment with the capabilities of the display technology to maximize picture quality.

Final Verdict: Which Technology Reigns Supreme?

In the competitive landscape of display technologies, each option—Full Array LED, QLED, OLED, and Mini LED—offers unique advantages, catering to various user preferences and requirements. Full Array LED displays are praised for their cost-effectiveness and reliable performance, making them a suitable choice for budget-conscious consumers. Their ability to provide decent brightness levels and contrast ratios is beneficial for viewers in well-lit environments.

QLED technology, backed by quantum dot innovation, stands out for its vibrant color reproduction and impressive brightness. This technology is ideal for large spaces where high luminance can enhance the viewing experience. The durable nature of QLED displays also appeals to users concerned with longevity and potential burn-in issues common in other technologies.

In contrast, OLED displays excel in delivering exceptional blacks and contrast ratios due to their ability to turn off individual pixels, resulting in an unparalleled viewing experience. This feature is particularly prominent for home theater enthusiasts who prioritize picture quality in darker settings. However, this advanced technology may come with a higher price tag, which could be a consideration for budget-sensitive shoppers.

Mini LED technology emerges as a significant contender, effectively bridging the gap between traditional LED and OLED displays. By utilizing smaller backlight dimming zones, Mini LED can enhance brightness levels and contrast while reducing issues like blooming associated with standard LED technology. It serves as a great alternative for users seeking high-quality picture performance without fully committing to the premium expenses of OLED.

Ultimately, the best choice depends on individual viewing habits, budget constraints, and specific aesthetic preferences. By evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of each technology, consumers can make an informed decision that best fits their unique requirements and enhances their overall viewing experience. A careful consideration of these factors will lead to a satisfying investment in a display technology that suits your specific needs.

Future of Display Technologies

The landscape of display technologies is rapidly evolving, with significant advancements anticipated in the coming years. The focus on improving picture quality has prompted innovation in various display technologies, particularly in Full Array LED, QLED, OLED, and Mini LED. Each of these technologies brings unique characteristics that cater to evolving user preferences and viewing experiences.

One notable trend is the enhancement of brightness and color accuracy, particularly within OLED and QLED technologies. With the continuous advancement in quantum dot technology, QLED displays are expected to offer even more vibrant colors and superior energy efficiency. Manufacturers are working on improving the efficiency of quantum dots, which can lead to wider color gamuts and enhancing overall visual performance. As a result, consumers may experience richer and more lifelike images, making QLED even more competitive in the high-end market.

On the other hand, Mini LED technology is poised to redefine the viewing experience by providing better localized dimming and superior contrast ratios compared to traditional Full Array LED displays. Mini LED technology, utilizing thousands of smaller LEDs, allows for more precise control over lighting, significantly improving black levels and dynamic range. This advancement may propel Mini LED to be a frontrunner in the battle for market dominance due to its combination of affordability and exceptional picture quality.

Moreover, advancements in virtual and augmented reality may also influence the development of display technologies. As these immersive experiences gain popularity, the need for displays that can offer superior motion handling and responsiveness will escalate. Thus, manufacturers may need to adapt existing technologies or develop new innovations to stay relevant in an increasingly competitive market.

In conclusion, the future of display technologies promises exciting potential for advancements in Full Array LED, QLED, OLED, and Mini LED. With continuous innovation, consumers can anticipate improvements in picture quality and overall viewing experiences that will shape their preferences for years to come.

Posted on by — Leave a comment

Upgrading from LCD to LED TV: Understanding the Differences and Picture Quality

Upgrading from LCD to LED TV: Understanding the Differences and Picture Quality

Understanding LCD and LED Technology

Liquid Crystal Display (LCD) technology has been a staple in television designs for several years. At its core, an LCD TV operates through the manipulation of liquid crystals, which do not emit light by themselves. Instead, they require a light source to create the visible image. This backlighting—typically provided by fluorescent lamps—shines through the liquid crystals to produce colorful visuals. The arrangement and orientation of these liquid crystals determine the projection of colors and images on the screen.

As technology advanced, the introduction of Light Emitting Diode (LED) technology revolutionized how pictures are rendered on televisions. While LED TVs are fundamentally still LCDs—because they utilize liquid crystal panels—the significant difference lies in the backlighting method. LED technology replaces the traditional fluorescent lights with small, energy-efficient diodes that emit light directly. This transition not only enhances brightness but also improves color accuracy and contrast. LED TVs are often available in two configurations: Edge-lit and Direct-lit systems. In Edge-lit LED TVs, the diodes are positioned along the screen’s perimeter, casting light toward the center. This allows for thinner designs, though it may result in less uniform brightness across the display. In contrast, Direct-lit LED TVs feature an even distribution of diodes placed behind the screen, offering more consistent lighting but typically making the television bulkier.

Overall, while both LCD and LED technologies serve a similar purpose in displaying images and videos, the distinctions, particularly in their backlighting methods, lead to varied viewing experiences. LED technology’s advancements in brightness and color representation significantly enhance the overall picture quality, positioning it as a more favorable option for consumers considering an upgrade from older LCD models. Understanding these differences is pivotal for making informed decisions when selecting a new television.

Picture Quality Comparison: LCD vs. LED

When considering the transition from LCD to LED TV, one of the most significant aspects to evaluate is picture quality. Both technologies differ notably in brightness, contrast, color accuracy, and refresh rates, affecting the overall viewing experience.

Brightness is one of the most pronounced advantages of LED TVs. Employing advanced backlighting technologies such as Full Array or Edge-Lit LED, these televisions can achieve higher luminosity levels compared to traditional LCD models. This capability allows LED TVs to produce vivid images even in well-lit environments, making them an excellent choice for daytime viewing. In contrast, LCDs often struggle with brightness, which may limit their effectiveness in bright rooms and lead to a subpar viewing experience.

Contrast levels also vary significantly between the two types. LED TVs typically exhibit superior contrast ratios due to their ability to dim individually lit zones of the screen. This feature creates deeper blacks and brighter whites, resulting in more striking images. In contrast, standard LCD TVs often produce a washout effect in darker scenes, diminishing the overall depth of the picture.

Color accuracy plays a crucial role in enhancing picture quality. LED TVs can reproduce a wider color gamut, which translates into more vibrant and true-to-life colors. This capacity allows viewers to enjoy a more immersive experience when watching movies or playing video games. Conversely, LCDs may not deliver the same level of accurate color reproduction, as they tend to have limited color ranges.

Refresh rates are essential for dynamic picture clarity. LED TVs generally offer higher refresh rates, reducing motion blur in fast-paced scenes, which is particularly beneficial for sports and action films. Higher refresh rates contribute to smoother transitions and increased detail in moving images, an area where LCDs may lag behind.

In essence, comparing picture quality between LCD and LED TVs reveals that LED technology often prevails, providing enhanced brightness, contrast, and color accuracy. These factors collectively contribute to an overall improved viewing experience.

Benefits of Upgrading to an LED TV

Upgrading from an LCD TV to an LED TV offers numerous benefits that enhance the viewing experience, making it a worthwhile investment for consumers. One of the primary advantages of LED televisions is their improved energy efficiency. LED technology utilizes light-emitting diodes, which consume significantly less power compared to traditional LCD screens that rely on fluorescent backlighting. This reduced energy consumption not only leads to lower utility bills but also contributes to a more environmentally friendly household.

Another compelling benefit of LED TVs is their design. These televisions are typically thinner and lighter than their LCD counterparts, allowing for easier installation and a more aesthetically pleasing look in modern living spaces. The sleek profile of LED screens provides consumers with greater flexibility in terms of furniture arrangement and wall mounting, ultimately maximizing room space.

Furthermore, LED TVs often come equipped with advanced technologies such as 4K and High Dynamic Range (HDR). These features enhance picture quality by delivering sharper images, greater color accuracy, and improved contrast. With 4K resolution, viewers can enjoy four times the detail of standard HD, making every movie and television show an immersive experience. HDR technology allows for better highlight and shadow details, resulting in a more realistic visual output that brings content to life.

The lifespan of LED technology also exceeds that of traditional LCD displays. LED TVs generally boast a longer operational life, with many models lasting upwards of 10 years or more under normal use. This longevity can offer considerable value, allowing consumers to enjoy high-quality performance without the need for frequent replacements. Given these advantages—ranging from energy efficiency and design to picture quality and durability—it is clear why upgrading to an LED television is an enticing option for those seeking enhanced home entertainment.

Considerations Before Making the Upgrade

Upgrading from an LCD to an LED TV involves several thoughtful considerations that can significantly impact your overall viewing experience. First and foremost, it is essential to evaluate your personal viewing habits. Take note of how often you watch television, what types of content you engage with most (movies, sports, gaming), and whether you typically watch alone or with family and friends. Understanding your viewing patterns will help you select a model that aligns with your needs.

Budget constraints also play a vital role in the upgrading process. LED TVs generally come with a range of price points based on brand, size, and feature set. It is advisable to establish a budget before exploring options, as this will narrow down your choices and aid in effective decision-making. Consider both upfront costs and long-term value; investing in a higher-quality model may provide enhanced longevity and improved picture quality, ultimately offering better value over time.

Room conditions should not be overlooked when contemplating an upgrade. The ambient light in your viewing area can greatly affect image quality. For instance, bright rooms may benefit from an LED TV that excels in handling glare, while darker environments can take advantage of LED’s superior contrast ratios. Additionally, the available space should dictate the size of your new display. A larger screen can enhance immersion, but an oversized TV in a small room may lead to discomfort.

Finally, selecting the right model can be a daunting task given the sheer number of options available. Researching various brands and reading user reviews will aid in making an informed decision. It may also be helpful to check for warranty offerings, customer support, and the availability of features such as smart technology and connectivity options. By taking these factors into account, you can ensure a smooth transition to your new LED TV, enriching your viewing experience significantly.

Posted on by

Four arrested in connection with M&S and Co-op cyber-attacks

Joe Tidy

Cyber correspondent, BBC World Service

Alamy M&S and Co-op store frontsAlamy

Four people have been arrested by police investigating the cyber-attacks that have caused havoc at M&S and the Co-op.

The National Crime Agency (NCA) says a 20-year-old woman was arrested in Staffordshire, and three males – aged between 17 and 19 – were detained in London and the West Midlands.

They were apprehended on suspicion of Computer Misuse Act offences, blackmail, money laundering and participating in the activities of an organised crime group.

All four were arrested at their homes in the early hours of Thursday. Electronic devices were also seized by the police.

One of the suspects – a 19-year-old man – is from Latvia, the rest are from the UK.

Neighbours described a large police operation in the quiet Staffordshire cul-de-sac where the 20-year-old was arrested.

They said dozens of NCA officers, some wearing balaclavas, arrived in the early hours of this morning and smashed down the door of a family home. Later they were seen taking away a large number of electronic devices.

Paul Foster, head of the NCA’s National Cyber Crime Unit, said the arrests were a “significant step” in its investigation.

“But our work continues, alongside partners in the UK and overseas, to ensure those responsible are identified and brought to justice,” he added.

NCA police

The hacks – which began in mid April – have caused huge disruption for the two retailers.

Some Co-op shelves were left bare for weeks, while M&S expects its operations to be affected until late July, with some IT systems not fully operational until October or November.

The chairman of M&S told MPs this week that it felt like the hack was an attempt to destroy the business. The retailer has estimated it will cost it £300m in lost profits.

Harrods was also targeted in an attack that had less impact on its operations.

A wave of attacks

M&S was the first to be breached. A huge amount of private data belonging to customers and staff was stolen.

The criminals also deployed malicious software called ransomware scrambling the company’s IT networks making them unusable unless a ransom was paid.

The BBC revealed that the hackers had sent an offensive email to the M&S boss demanding payment.

A few days after M&S was breached the Co-op was also targeted by criminals who broke in and stole the private data of millions of its customers and staff.

The Co-op was forced to admit that the data breach had happened after hackers contacted the BBC with proof that the firm was downplaying the cyber attack.

The BBC later discovered from the criminals that the company disconnected the internet from IT networks in the nick of time to stop the hackers from deploying ransomware and so causing even more disruption.

Shortly after Co-op announced it had been attacked, luxury retailer Harrods said it too had been targeted and had been forced to disconnect IT systems from the internet to keep the criminals out.

The four people arrested are a 17-year-old British male from the West Midlands, a 19-year-old British man from London, a 19-year-old Latvian male from the West Midlands and a 20-year-old British woman from Staffordshire.

The NCA said its operation was supported by officers from the West Midlands Regional Organised Crime Unit and the East Midlands Special Operations Unit.

A green promotional banner with black squares and rectangles forming pixels, moving in from the right. The text says: “Tech Decoded: The world’s biggest tech news in your inbox every Monday.”
Posted on by

Linda Yaccarino departs as boss of Musk’s X

Graham Fraser, Zoe Kleinman, and Lily Jamali

BBC News

Getty Images Linda YaccarinoGetty Images

Linda Yaccarino, the boss of Elon Musk’s social media site X, has announced she is stepping down after two years.

Her departure comes at a time of tumult for the platform, which was taken over by Musk’s artificial intelligence (AI) venture, xAI, in March, and has been in the spotlight for antisemitic posts churned out by its AI chatbot, Grok.

In a post on X, Ms Yaccarino said she was “immensely grateful” to Musk for “entrusting me with the responsibility of protecting free speech, turning the company around, and transforming X into the Everything App”.

Musk posted a brief reply, saying only: “Thank you for your contributions.”

The BBC has approached X for comment. It is not clear what sparked the decision, or whether there has been any break down in the relationship between the two leaders.

Ms Yaccarino was previously head of advertising at NBCUniversal, where she was credited with helping to steer it through the upheaval caused by technology firms.

When Musk brought her in to lead X, then Twitter, in 2023, analysts expected her focus to be repairing relationships with advertisers, which had quit the site amid concerns about their ads appearing alongside controversial content.

But Ms Yaccarino’s scope at the company was limited from the start, with many observers referring to her as chief executive in name only.

“Her background and actual authority positioned her more as the company’s chief advertising officer, rather than its CEO. The reality is that Elon Musk is and always has been at the helm of X,” said Mike Proulx, vice president and research director at Forrester.

“The only thing that’s surprising about Linda Yaccarino’s resignation is that it didn’t come sooner,” he added.

Advertising turnaround?

Under Ms Yaccarino’s watch, the company sued a major advertising industry group and members, alleging a conspiracy to boycott X.

The industry group shuttered shortly after the lawsuit was filed.

The platform’s tone changed significantly during the course of Yaccarino’s tenure.

Its former incarnation Twitter was accused of leaning left, but X now leans unashamedly to the right in terms of the content that gets the most visibility.

Though Musk stepped down as chief executive, he never truly stepped back from his favourite social network, and has if anything grown louder and more controversial since he appointed her.

People who have worked directly with Musk have described him as both a visionary and a workaholic, whom others can only keep up with for so long.

“Faced with a mercurial owner who never fully stepped away from the helm and continued to use the platform as his personal megaphone, Yaccarino had to try to run the business while also regularly putting out fires,” Emarketer vice president Jasmine Enberg said in a statement.

She said her firm expected X’s ad business to return to growth this year, after more than halving after Musk’s takeover.

But she added: “The reasons for X’s ad recovery are complicated, and Yaccarino was unable to restore the platform’s reputation among advertisers.”

In Ms Yaccarino’s departure post, she said that she had decided to step down after “two incredible years”.

She added: “When Elon Musk and I first spoke of his vision for X, I knew it would be the opportunity of a lifetime to carry out the extraordinary mission of this company.”

Ms Yaccarino’s exit comes at a difficult time for Musk, who is dealing with falling sales at his car maker Tesla, which has also seen the departure of a number of top executives.

He is also embroiled in a war of words with his former political ally, US President Donald Trump, culminating in Musk planning a new political party.

X has also continued to attract controversy.

The most recent of these has seen Musk’s chatbot, Grok – which is embedded in X – speak favourably about Hitler among other antisemitic posts early this week.

Musk on Friday had said the company had been working to overhaul Grok and that users “should notice a difference” when asking Grok questions.

In instructions posted publicly by the company, Grok was directed to “[a]ssume subjective viewpoints sourced from the media are biased” and to “not shy away from making claims which are politically incorrect.”

In a statement, xAI said it was working to remove what it called “inappropriate” posts.

A green promotional banner with black squares and rectangles forming pixels, moving in from the right. The text says: “Tech Decoded: The world’s biggest tech news in your inbox every Monday.”